If Donald J. Trump’s Latest Threats Don’t Wake You Up, Nothing Will
A president calling for the execution of his political opponents is not a headline from another century. It is the news of the week.
If Donald J. Trump’s most recent comments calling for the execution of Democratic lawmakers for “seditious behavior” after they advised military personnel to refuse illegal orders—aren’t enough to shake the MAGA faithful from their trance, then no further evidence will ever suffice. At some point, loyalty to a man over the Constitution ceases to be patriotism and becomes something far darker. It becomes submission.
For those who missed it, six current members of Congress each with backgrounds in the Army, Navy, CIA, or intelligence community—issued a simple, solemn reminder to U.S. service members: your oath is to the Constitution, not to the personal whims of the President. They urged the military to refuse unlawful orders, should those orders ever arrive.
That is not sedition.
That is not rebellion.
That is their duty.
And the law backs them unequivocally.
THE LAW IS EXPLICIT: NO ONE MUST OBEY AN ILLEGAL ORDER
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is not ambiguous. It demands that service members refuse manifestly unlawful orders—commands so blatantly illegal that no reasonable person could mistake them for legitimate. Orders to kill civilians, torture detainees, or violate constitutional rights fall squarely into this category.
- Article 90 and Article 92: disobeying a lawful order is a crime.
- But an unlawful order? There is no duty to obey it, and in many cases, an obligation to refuse.
An illegal order is one that violates:
- the Constitution,
- federal law,
- international law, or
- established rules of engagement.
Executive orders offer no refuge either. They can be challenged, suspended, or struck down if they run afoul of constitutional or statutory limits. Federal officials not only may refuse an illegal directive—they must.
These representatives knew the law, upheld the law, and reminded the military of its oath. They acted with courage. They acted with clarity. They acted as guardians of the Republic.
TRUMP’S RESPONSE WAS PREDICTABLE—AND CHILLING
The reaction from the self-styled “Commander-in-Chief”—or, more accurately, the Commander-in-Thief—should shock no one but should horrify everyone. Trump immediately erupted with calls for imprisonment and suggested that these lawmakers should face the death penalty.
Pause on that.
The sitting President of the United States called for the execution of American citizens—current members of Congress and former military officers—for reminding soldiers that they must refuse illegal orders.
On what planet is the military expected to obey illegal ordersl?
This isn’t strength.
This isn’t patriotism.
This is lunacy on a planetary scale.
Republicans, Democrats, Independents everyone should be afraid.
Because Trump is not hinting anymore. He is not winking to his base. He is saying out loud that political opposition is a capital offense. He is openly signaling that he plans to issue illegal orders and expects the military to comply without question.
We have seen flashes of this before ICE, DHS, and National Guard units deployed against peaceful citizens. These were the previews. Now we are seeing the feature presentation.
THE NUCLEAR QUESTION: WHAT HAPPENS WHEN NO ONE CAN SAY NO?
Some will wave this away.
“He doesn’t mean it.”
“It’s just Trump being Trump.”
But what happens the day he issues an order that cannot be stopped?
Most Americans forget an uncomfortable truth:
The Secret Service cannot deny the President access to nuclear codes.
They cannot judge legality.
They cannot assess sanity.
They cannot refuse.
Only the President has unilateral authority to order a nuclear strike. If a mentally unstable, narcissistic man in the grip of rage, paranoia, or cognitive decline decided to target New York, San Francisco, Chicago, or any city he deems disloyal, nothing in the chain of command is designed to stop him before launch.
That is the system.
That is the danger.
That is why stable leadership is not optional, it is existential.
HISTORY HAS SEEN MEN LIKE THIS BEFORE
Trump’s rhetoric is not the harmless bluster his apologists insist it is. It is not a joke. It is not a quirk. It is the hallmark of something older, darker, and well-documented.
Who else threatened, hunted, and executed political opponents?
- Stalin, who executed up to a million political rivals.
- Hitler, who executed another million in his consolidation of absolute power.
- Mussolini, who dispatched thousands for the simple crime of dissent.
None of these victims broke any laws.
Their only offense was opposing the man in power.
Trump now places himself firmly in that lineage. Nine months into his second term, he is already calling for the execution of political opponents and signaling a willingness even an eagerness to issue illegal military orders.
A DEBT OF GRATITUDE—AND A WARNING
We owe an enormous debt to Ellisa Slotkin, Mark Kelly, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Jason Crow, and Maggie Goodlander, elected officials and former military officers who put the Constitution above politics and personal safety. Their loyalty is to the nation, not to a man.
Trump’s loyalty, as always, is to himself.
And here is the unavoidable warning:
If, after everything Trump has done, after everything he has promised to do, you still support him, then do not feign shock when this era ends with something resembling a modern Nuremberg trial.
“Just following orders” is not a defense.
It wasn’t then.
It won’t be now.
To the MAGA supporters: understand this clearly. You may cheer for him today.
But authoritarianism always eats its own. One day it will be your turn, and when it comes, there will be no one left to protect you.
Key Takeaways
- Trump’s threat to execute lawmakers is authoritarian rhetoric, not political rhetoric.
- Military law mandates refusal of illegal orders, no matter who issues them.
- Only the President can launch nuclear weapons—no one can stop him.
- His rhetoric mirrors the emotional patterns of historic dictators.
- The danger is not hypothetical. It is active. It is escalating.
Why It Matters
Because once a president declares that opposition is treason and dissent is a capital offense, the Republic is already in mortal danger.
Because authoritarian leaders do not moderate; they escalate.
Because democracy survives only when power can be questioned and Trump is trying to make questioning him a crime.
Further Reading
- “On Tyranny” – Timothy Snyder. A concise, urgent guide to resisting authoritarian movements. https://civilheresy.com/on tyranny
- “The Origins of Totalitarianism” – Hannah Arendt. A seminal analysis of how democracies decay and dictators rise. https://civilheresy.com/The Origins of Totalitarianism Expanded Edition
- “Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present” – Ruth Ben-Ghiat A sweeping account of how strongmen gain power—and how they fall. https://civilheresy.com/strongmen
Wear the resistance
Shop the message at https://shop.civilheresy.com/ and support independent dissent.
